A Better Way to Restore the Chesapeake Bay

A Better Way to Restore the Chesapeake Bay

Debate summary

Maryland officials expect that it will cost over $14 billion in the next decade to meet EPA pollution mitigation targets for the Chesapeake Bay by 2025. Yet Maryland has pointedly ignored a single, enormous source of the pollutants—the massive amount of water-scoured sediment and trapped nitrogen and phosphorus behind the Susquehanna River’s Conowingo Dam. Periodic discharges from the dam, such as the one following Tropical Storm Lee in 2011, spill enormous amounts of sediment and nutrients into the Bay, dwarfing the most optimistic cleanup targets that have been set for the watershed.

What should Maryland do to reduce Chesapeake Bay pollution, and is current policy too much or too little?

 

Co-Sponsors:

TJI logo     logo circle tmMaryland-Reporter-log

 

Moderator

Christian Krahforst, Ph.D.

Mellon Postdoctoral Fellow, Center for Environment & Society - Washington College

Photo's from event

One Response to “A Better Way to Restore the Chesapeake Bay”

  1. […] Summers of the Maryland Public Policy Institute invited me to a Maryland Policy Forum on A Better Way to Restore the Chesapeake Bay, to be held Tuesday night (the 28th of October) at Washington College in Chestertown. (It would be […]

Leave a Reply to A debate worth having : monoblogue